BEWARE: JUMOJOBERT

raffyalcoriza:

I checked on the cache again. Didn’t notice that. (Nice heads-up.)

I still stand on that “her work is a form of literature, not something NSFW” statement - if not for that specific term I’ve found. Shakespeare and other well-renowned writers do occasionally include some “intimate scenes”; and they insert it as artistically beautiful as possible.

But this time, I shall agree: Faindy could have used a better, more generally accepted term than what she included wrote.

I agree to this post.

(And hell no, I didn’t m’ed on her post. I know how to distinguish how a work of art differs from a crapwork.)

Oi tita! Pwede ring maging NSFW ang literature no? Anong klaseng chuchubels to? Chorva!